Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrews v. Creacey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrews v. Creacey Anchor | green | “in virginia, non-constitutional error is harmless 'when it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached.” | 12 |
| 2 | Christopher Farrell v. Warren County Department of Social Services | green | “virginia's jurisprudence recognizes that 'past actions and relationships over a meaningful period serve as good indicators of what the future may be expected to hold.” | 10 |
| 3 | Philip Surles v. Kristan Mayer and Marty Cullen, Jr. | green | “generally, the admissibility of evidence 'is within the broad discretion of the trial court, and an evidentiary ruling will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of 4 father's objection to the line of questioning was noted in his objections attached to the final …” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.