Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mark G. Epstein Samuel C. Arsers, on Behalf of Themselves & All Others Similarly Situated v. Washington Energy Co. James A. Thorpe.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mark G. Epstein Samuel C. Arsers, on Behalf of Themselves & All Others Similarly Situated v. Washington Energy Co. James A. Thorpe Anchor | green | “are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs.” | 8 |
| 2 | Chang v. Chen | red | “dismissal without leave to amend is improper unless it is clear, upon de novo review, that the complaint could not be saved by any amendment.” | 6 |
| 3 | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7276, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,439 Elizabeth Ballard v. Michael E. Savage, and Royal Trust Bank (Austria) | green | “have taken deliberate actions within the forum state,” | 3 |
| 4 | Ricky Crawford v. Indiana Department of Corrections | green | “includes every possible agency of state or local government.” | 3 |
| 5 | Armstrong v. Wilson | green | “denied him the benefit of post-arrest transportation appropriate in light of his disability” | 3 |
| 6 | Gonzalez v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority | green | “we evaluate the complaint de novo to decide whether it states a claim upon which relief could be granted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.