Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Revels v. Vincenz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revels v. Vincenz Anchor | green | “although an involuntarily committed patient of a state hospital is not a prisoner per se, his confinement is subject to the same safety and security concerns as that of a prisoner.” | 11 |
| 2 | Young v. Selk | green | “objectively, sufficiently serious,' under the first requirement when the official's failure to protect resulted in the inmate being 'incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of serious harm.” | 10 |
| 3 | Marc Hall v. Ramsey County | green | “government officials have 'an unquestioned duty to provide reasonable safety for all residents and personnel within an institution' where people are involuntarily committed.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.