Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doe Ex Rel. Houdersheldt v. Blair.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doe Ex Rel. Houdersheldt v. Blair Anchor | green | “congress has placed broad restrictions on the power of federal appellate courts to review district court orders remanding removed cases to state court.” | 11 |
| 2 | Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc. | green | “(1) a district court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction or (2) a defect in removal other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction that was raised by the motion of a party within 30 days after the notice of removal was filed.” | 8 |
| 3 | Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc. | green | “based on (1) a district court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction or (2) a defect in removal other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction that was raised by the motion of a party within 30 days after the notice of removal was filed.” | 4 |
| 4 | Peter Vlaming v. West Point School Board | green | “28 u.s.c. 1443 . . . only pertains to laws dealing with racial equality, which is not the case here.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.