Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 179 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dodds v. Richardson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dodds v. Richardson Anchor | green | “iqbal may very well have abrogated 1983 supervisory liability as we previously understood it in this circuit in ways we do not need to address to resolve this case.” | 69 |
| 2 | Dodds v. Richardson | green | “the supreme court's previously enunciated 1983 causation and personal involvement analysis.” | 65 |
| 3 | Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics | green | “by a federal agent acting under color of his authority gives rise to a cause of action for damages consequent upon his unconstitutional conduct.” | 45 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.