Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jones v. Sussex I State Prison.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones v. Sussex I State Prison Anchor | green | “that 'both the operative facts and the controlling legal principles were presented to the state court.” | 11 |
| 2 | Marcus Robinson v. Edward Thomas | green | “a habeas petitioner satisfies the exhaustion requirement by 'fairly presenting his claim in each appropriate state court . . . thereby alerting that court to the federal nature of the claim.” | 11 |
| 3 | Jones v. Sussex I State Prison | green | “both the operative facts and the controlling legal principles were presented to the state court.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.