Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Parish v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parish v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. Anchor | green | “a fact is material if it will affect the outcome of the suit, given the applicable law.” | 10 |
| 2 | Wilson v. Darr | green | “resisting party has no evidence to factually support an outcome determinative element of that party's claim, the moving party will prevail on summary judgment.” | 8 |
| 3 | Estate of Harris v. Papa John's Pizza | green | “party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 4 |
| 4 | Crippen v. City of Cedar Rapids | green | “indulges in every legitimate inference that the evidence will bear in an effort to ascertain the existence” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.