Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bird v. Casa Royale West.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bird v. Casa Royale West Anchor | green | “required to determine whether the trial court erred in concluding that an absence of genuine issues of material fact justified its granting of summary judgment.” | 12 |
| 2 | Wiltsie v. Baby Grand Corp. | green | “in determining whether summary judgment is proper, the nonmoving party is entitled to have the evidence and all reasonable inferences accepted as true.” | 8 |
| 3 | Wiltsie v. Baby Grand Corp. | green | “in determining whether summary judgment is proper, the nonmov-ing party is entitled to have the evidence and all reasonable inferences accepted as true.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.