Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. Anchor | green | “mere knowledge of the fraudulent or illegal actions of another is also not enough to show a conspiracy.” | 8 |
| 2 | Buckner v. Atlantic Plant Maintenance, Inc. | green | “the mere characterization of a combination of acts as a conspiracy is insufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss.” | 8 |
| 3 | Evitts v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp. | green | “a court abuses its discretion only where its ruling is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, or where no reasonable person would adopt the court's view.” | 6 |
| 4 | Evitts v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp. | green | “arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, or where no reasonable person would adopt the court's view.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.