Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mobil Oil Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mobil Oil Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co. Anchor | green | “the interests of the insurer would be furthered by providing a less than vigorous defense to the allegations against the insured.” | 4 |
| 2 | Gothberg v. Nemerovski | green | “the procuring of automobile public liability insurance of the type contemplated has connotations extending to the general public above and beyond the private interests of the two contracting parties.” | 4 |
| 3 | Continental Casualty Co. v. Westerfield | green | “although the decisions of foreign courts are not binding, 'the use of foreign decisions as persuasive authority is appropriate where illinois authority on point is lacking or absent.” | 4 |
| 4 | Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Parks | green | “the amount of the overall settlement in light of the value of the case ; a comparison with awards or verdicts in similar cases involving similar injuries ; the facts known to the settling insured at the time of the settlement ; the presence of a covenant not to execute as part o…” | 4 |
| 5 | Wellington Homes, Inc. v. West Dundee China Palace Restaurant, Inc. | green | “involved a question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion.” | 4 |
| 6 | Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hiar Holding, L.L.C. | green | “caused by or at the direction of the insured with the knowledge that the act would violate the rights of another and would inflict 'personal and advertising injury.” | 4 |
| 7 | Gothberg v. Nemerovski | green | “connotations extending to the general public above and beyond the private interests of the two contracting parties” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.