Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Whalen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Whalen Anchor | green | “may not supply missing evidence, or give the state the benefit of unreasonable, speculative or forced inferences.” | 9 |
| 2 | State v. Grim | green | “unless they are such a natural and logical extension of the evidence that a reasonable juror would be unable to disregard them.” | 7 |
| 3 | State of Missouri v. Thomas A. Ess | green | “to determine whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support a conviction and to withstand a motion for judgment of acquittal, this court does not weigh the evidence but rather accepts as true all evidence tending to prove guilt together with all reasonable inferences t…” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Whalen | green | “supply missing evidence, or give the state the benefit of unreasonable, speculative or forced inferences.” | 3 |
| 5 | State of Missouri v. Gary Leland Coleman | green | “there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable fact-finder might have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.