Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from in the Interest of S.R., S.R. and B.R.S., Children.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | in the Interest of S.R., S.R. and B.R.S., Children Anchor | green | “while endangerment often involves physical endangerment, the statute does not require that conduct be directed at a child or that the child actually suffers injury; rather, the specific danger to the child's well-being may be inferred from parents' misconduct alone.” | 13 |
| 2 | in the Interest of D.R.A. and A.F., Children | green | “regarding this factor, we note that the need for permanence is a paramount consideration for the child's present and future physical and emotional needs.” | 9 |
| 3 | In Re ACB | green | “evidence of a recent turnaround should be determinative only if it is reasonable to conclude that rehabilitation, once begun, will surely continue” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.