Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Parish v. Municipality No. 2.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parish v. Municipality No. 2 Anchor | green | “servitudes are restraints on the free disposal and use of property, and are not, on that account, entitled to be viewed with favor by the law.” | 11 |
| 2 | McGuffy v. Weil | green | “any doubt as to the interpretation of a servitude encumbering property must be resolved in favor of the property owner” | 7 |
| 3 | Buras Ice Factory, Inc. v. Department of Highways | green | “servitudes are restraints on the free disposal and use of property, and are not, on that account, entitled to be viewed with favor by the law.” | 4 |
| 4 | Holman v. Comm'r | green | “we need not rely on the unsupported opinion of an expert witness” | 2 |
| 5 | Holman v. Comm'r | green | “we need not rely on the unsupported opinion of an expert witness.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.