Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McKinley v. Drozd.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McKinley v. Drozd Anchor | green | “to prevail in a claim under the act, rather than to obtain a net recovery on all claims joined in one lawsuit.” | 7 |
| 2 | McKinley v. Drozd | green | “the more sensible meaning of the word 'prevail' is to prevail in a claim under the act, rather than to obtain a net recovery on all claims joined in one lawsuit,” | 5 |
| 3 | Roberts v. Grande | green | “to prevail in a claim under the act, rather than to obtain a net recovery on all claims joined in one lawsuit.” | 5 |
| 4 | Rowland & Rowland, P.C. v. Texas Employers Indemnity Co. | green | “there is an abundance of case law in which texas courts have manifested their interest in examining settlements in third-party actions to ensure an insurance carrier's right to subrogation” | 5 |
| 5 | Hamra v. Gulden | green | “does not apply in a case in which a consumer has already received payment of an amount equal to or greater than the damages found by the fact finder in the trial of the consumer's case against the non-settling defendant.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.