Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jaime Guzman v. Melvin Jones.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaime Guzman v. Melvin Jones Anchor | green | “a party's duty to preserve evidence comes into being when the party has notice that the evidence is relevant to the litigation or should have known that the evidence may be relevant.” | 16 |
| 2 | Woodson v. Surgitek, Inc. | green | “bad faith or willful abuse of the judicial process.” | 3 |
| 3 | Rose v. Batson v. Neal Spelce Associates, Inc. | green | “is penal in nature; it is designed to penalize those who engage in the charged conduct and to deter others who might be tempted to follow in similar conduct.” | 3 |
| 4 | Cadle Company v. James Moore, III | green | “bad faith or willful abuse of the judicial process” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.