Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Walter Love v. JP Cullen & Sons, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walter Love v. JP Cullen & Sons, Incorporated Anchor | green | “construes all facts and inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” | 9 |
| 2 | Gulino v. Economy Fire and Casualty Company | green | “to affirmatively demonstrate that the loss resulted from a peril expressly excluded from coverage.” | 5 |
| 3 | KHAIRKHWA v. Obama | green | “person who holds a graduate degree typically qualifies as an expert in his or her field.” | 3 |
| 4 | American Country Insurance v. Efficient Construction Corp. | green | “the appearance to a reasonable person that a claim covered by a policy may be brought against the insured.” | 3 |
| 5 | Pittway Corp. v. American Motorists Insurance | green | “the record before us establishes substantial prejudice as a matter of law since by the time american received notice of the first loss the damaged property had been scrapped making inspection or further investigation impossible in any reasonable sense.” | 3 |
| 6 | Sentinel Insurance Co. v. Cogan | green | “routinely found to be sophisticated in commercial and insurance matters simply by virtue of their profession.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.