Topic: the extraordinary protections of labor law 240 (1) extend … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #15598

6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nieves v. Five Boro Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Corp..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Nieves v. Five Boro Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Corp. Anchor
ny · 1999
green “the extraordinary protections of labor law 240 (1) extend only to a narrow class of special hazards, and do 'not encompass any and all perils that may be connected in some tangential way with the effects of gravity” 11
2 Aloi v. Structure-Tone, Inc.
nyappdiv · 2003
green “it was not caused by the limited type of elevation-related hazards encompassed by labor law 240 (1)” 3
3 Perrini v. City of New York
nyappdiv · 1999
green “while it is well settled that leave to amend shall be freely given in the absence of prejudice to the opponent . . . , permission to amend should be denied where the proposed amendment clearly lacks merit” 3
4 Wilke v. Communications Construction Group, Inc.
nyappdiv · 2000
green “factually inapplicable to the circumstances surrounding the happening of the accident and thus does not support a claim under labor law 241 (6)” 3
5 Anderson v. Bush Industries, Inc.
nyappdiv · 2001
green “extend to 'hazards which are part of or inherent in the very work which the contractor is to perform” 3
6 Anderson v. Bush Industries, Inc.
nyappdiv · 2001
green “labor law 200 is a codification of the common-law duty imposed upon an owner or general contractor to provide employees with a safe place to work” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check