Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A. Anchor | green | “in such a situation the rights of all the parties can be adequately protected while the litigation on the main claim proceeds.” | 6 |
| 2 | University Life Insurance Company of America v. Unimarc Ltd. And George C. Huff | green | “section 4 of the united states arbitration act grants district courts the power to actually order the parties to arbitration, but this provision has not been interpreted to deprive the courts of continuing jurisdiction over the action.” | 4 |
| 3 | Roso-Lino Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc. | green | “the fact that a dispute is to be arbitrated ... does not absolve the court of its obligation to consider the merits of a requested preliminary injunction ...” | 4 |
| 4 | Teradyne, Inc. v. Mostek Corp. | green | “whether or not a preliminary injunction can be issued in an arbitrable dispute.” | 4 |
| 5 | Perpetual American Bank, F.S.B., a Federal Savings Bank v. Terrestrial Systems, Inc., a California Corporation, and Joann Ashley | green | “prejudgment writ of attachment is not an appealable order” | 4 |
| 6 | Williams v. Texas Department of Human Resources | green | “right to seek injunctive relief in court and its right to arbitrate are not incompatible....” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.