Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jaime Varela v. David Gonzales.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaime Varela v. David Gonzales Anchor | green | “factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged,” | 10 |
| 2 | Bosarge v. Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics | green | “in considering a motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 12(c), the court is generally limited to the contents of the pleadings, including attachments thereto.” | 4 |
| 3 | Machete Productions, L.L.C. v. Heather Page | green | “is designed to dispose of cases where the material facts are not in dispute and a judgment on the merits can be rendered by looking to the substance of the pleadings and any judicially noticed facts.” | 4 |
| 4 | Sandra Hale v. Metrex Research Corporation | green | “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 4 |
| 5 | Sandra Hale v. Metrex Research Corporation | green | “must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.