Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Haywood v. Drown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haywood v. Drown Anchor | green | “creates a remedy for violations of federal rights committed by persons acting under color of state law.” | 9 |
| 2 | Grancid Camilo-Robles v. Jose R. Zapata, A/K/A Jose R. Zapata-Rivera | green | “whether the supervisor's actions displayed deliberate indifference toward the rights of third parties and had some causal connection to the subsequent tort.” | 5 |
| 3 | Rivera v. Com. of Mass. | green | “the commonwealth has expressly exercised its prerogative to waive its sovereign immunity only insofar as claims are brought against it in its own judicial fora.” | 4 |
| 4 | Nobile v. Massachusetts | green | “the commonwealth has not consented to be sued in federal courts.” | 4 |
| 5 | Ford v. Bender | green | “there was no reasonable expectation that he will again be confined to the ddu as a pretrial detainee.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.