Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Miller v. J.D. Abrams Inc. (In Re Miller).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miller v. J.D. Abrams Inc. (In Re Miller) Anchor | green | “fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom such property has been entrusted, or into whose hands it has lawfully come.” | 17 |
| 2 | Manheim Automotive Financial v. Hurst | green | “the justifiable reliance standard imposes no duty to investigate unless the falsity of the representation is readily apparent or obvious or there are 'red flags' indicating such reliance is unwarranted.” | 4 |
| 3 | Latham v. Burgher | green | “actual fraud is defined as involving dishonesty of purpose or intent to deceive.” | 2 |
| 4 | Latham v. Burgher | green | “dishonesty of purpose or intent to deceive.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.