Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States Ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States Ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc. Anchor | green | “the details of the defendants' allegedly fraudulent acts, when they occurred, and who engaged in them.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States E Rel. Phalp v. Lincare Holdings, Inc. | green | “(1) the defendant made (or caused to be made) a false statement, (2) the defendant knew it to be false, and (3) the statement was material to a false claim.” | 8 |
| 3 | United States Ex Rel. Matheny v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc. | green | “we are more tolerant toward complaints that leave out some particularities of the submissions of a false claim if the complaint also alleges personal knowledge or participation in the fraudulent conduct.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States Ex Rel. Matheny v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc. | green | “as defendants recognize, we are more tolerant toward complaints that leave out some particularities of the submissions of a false claim if the complaint also alleges personal knowledge or participation in the fraudulent conduct.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.