Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gibbons v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gibbons v. United States Anchor | green | “the language of the statutes which confer jurisdiction upon the court of claims, excludes by the strongest implication demands against the government founded on torts.” | 11 |
| 2 | Martinez v. United States | green | “the district courts have exclusive jurisdiction in federal tort claims act actions.” | 8 |
| 3 | McCauley v. States | green | “district courts have ... exclusive jurisdiction over tort claims for any amount if they fall within the federal tort claims act, 28 u.s.c. 1346(b).” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.