Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hume v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hume v. United States Anchor | green | “such as no man in his senses and not under delusion would make on the one hand, and as no honest and fair man would accept on the other.” | 16 |
| 2 | Hume v. United States | green | “no man in his senses and not under delusion would make on the one hand, and as no honest and fair man would accept on the other.” | 6 |
| 3 | Smyth Bros.-McCleary-McClellan Co. v. Beresford | green | “gross disparity in the value exchanged is a significant factor in determining whether oppressive influences affected the agreement to the extent that the process was unfair and the terms of the resultant agreement unconscionable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.