Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas Anchor | green | “objective indications of the seriousness with which society regards the offense.” | 9 |
| 2 | Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas | green | “if he can demonstrate that any additional statutory penalties, viewed in conjunction with the maximum authorized period of incarceration, are so severe that they clearly reflect a legislative determination that the offense in question is a 'serious' one.” | 5 |
| 3 | Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas | green | “it has long been settled that 'there is a category of petty crimes or offenses which is not subject to the sixth amendment jury trial provision.” | 5 |
| 4 | City of Santa Fe v. Martinez | green | “in addition to the financial burden of a first offense dwi conviction, the penalties also involve a significant time investment.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Eger | green | “the absence of a notice of appeal and an affidavit of waiver strongly suggests the failure of trial counsel to consult adequately with the client concerning the right to appeal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.