Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant, emailed to you with a link to the setup page and always available from the account icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stachon v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stachon v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. Anchor | green | “a prevailing party is presumptively entitled to recover all of its costs.” | 14 |
| 2 | Smith v. Tenet Healthsystem Sl, Inc. | green | “however, such costs must be set out in 28 u.s.c. 1920 or some other statutory authorization.” | 6 |
| 3 | Janis v. Biesheuvel | green | “suggest a rationale under which the district court's actions constitute an abuse of discretion.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.