Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carlotta Rossini and Jane Zukofsky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Ogilvy & Mather, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carlotta Rossini and Jane Zukofsky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Ogilvy & Mather, Incorporated Anchor | green | “goes a long way toward satisfying the rule 23(b)(3) requirement of commonality.” | 7 |
| 2 | Ohio Public Employees Retirement System v. General Reinsurance Corp. | green | “manageability concerns do not stand in the way of certifying a settlement class” | 7 |
| 3 | In re Oxford Health Plans, Inc. | green | “where the class members have allegedly been injured by the same course of conduct as that which allegedly injured the proposed representative.” | 6 |
| 4 | In re Oxford Health Plans, Inc. | green | “the incentive to prove all the elements of the cause of action which would be presented by the individual members of the class were they initiating individualized actions.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.