Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harold M. Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harold M. Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Anchor | green | “the bankruptcy court is charged with an affirmative obligation to apprise itself of the underlying facts and to make an independent judgment as to whether the compromise is fair and equitable.” | 8 |
| 2 | Charles W. Bauer, Jr. And Nellie P. Bauer, Robert H. Waldschmidt, Trustee v. Commerce Union Bank, Clarksville, Tennessee and Kenneth C. Baines | green | “considering such factors as the probability of success on the merits, the complexity and expense of litigation, and the reasonable views of creditors.” | 7 |
| 3 | Gerard P. Fleischut, Regional Director for the 26th Region of the National Labor Relations Board v. Nixon Detroit Diesel, Inc. | green | “relies upon clearly erroneous findings of fact or when it improperly applies the law or uses an erroneous legal standard.” | 6 |
| 4 | Gerard P. Fleischut, Regional Director for the 26th Region of the National Labor Relations Board v. Nixon Detroit Diesel, Inc. | green | “abuses its discretion only when it relies upon clearly erroneous findings of fact or when it improperly applies the law or uses an erroneous legal standard.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.