Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. Treybig.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. Treybig Anchor | green | “in cases of corporate fraud where the false or misleading information is conveyed in prospectuses, registration statements, annual reports, press releases, or other 'group-published information,' it is reasonable to presume that these are the collective actions of the officers.” | 8 |
| 2 | Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc. | green | “pslra references to 'the defendant' may only reasonably be understood to mean 'each defendant' in multiple defendant cases.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Interactive Network, Inc. Securities Litigation | green | “the purpose of the doctrine is to relieve plaintiffs the burden of proving the authorship of a writing. this problem of authorship does not arise with oral statements.” | 4 |
| 4 | Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,361 Louis v. Jackvony, Jr. v. Riht Financial Corporation, Etc., John R. Cioci v. Riht Financial Corporation, Etc. | green | “nonreliance clauses in written stockpurchase agree ments preclude any possibility of damages under the federal securities laws for prior oral statements.” | 3 |
| 5 | Sears v. Likens | green | “a complaint that attributes misrepresentations to all defend ants, lumped together for pleading purposes, generally is in sufficient.” | 3 |
| 6 | Cerabio LLC and Phillips Plastics Corporation v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | green | “the parties were sophisticated commercial entities assisted by counsel” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.