Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The University Of Maryland At Baltimore v. Peat, Marwick, Main & Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The University Of Maryland At Baltimore v. Peat, Marwick, Main & Company Anchor | green | “conducted or participated in the conduct of the 'enterprise's affairs,' not just their own affairs.” | 5 |
| 2 | The University Of Maryland At Baltimore v. Peat, Marwick, Main & Company | green | “it cannot be said that by merely performing what are generic financial and related services . . . even if they are later found to be deficient, a firm has opened itself to liability under the federal racketeering statute.” | 5 |
| 3 | Ronald J. Srein and R.J. Srein Corp. v. Frankford Trust Company, N/k/a Key Trust Company | green | “authority or control respecting management of the plan or disposition of the plan's assets.” | 5 |
| 4 | Ronald J. Srein and R.J. Srein Corp. v. Frankford Trust Company, N/k/a Key Trust Company | green | “mere custody or possession over plan assets, without more,” | 5 |
| 5 | Connie Edmonson v. Lincoln National Life Insuranc | green | “performance of administrative and ministerial tasks by a mere custodian of plan assets does not amount to practical control” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.