Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Inmate 115235, C.A. Kruger v. Robert Erickson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inmate 115235, C.A. Kruger v. Robert Erickson Anchor | green | “if the prisoner is not challenging the validity of his conviction or the length of his detention, such as loss of good time, then a writ of habeas corpus is not the proper remedy.” | 16 |
| 2 | McKinnon v. Norris | green | “arkansas has not created a liberty interest in good time under the constitutional analysis in wolff v. mcdonnell,” | 3 |
| 3 | McKinnon v. Norris | green | “plainly states 'meritorious good time will not be applied to reduce the length of a sentence,” | 3 |
| 4 | Addones Spencer v. Anthony Haynes | green | “due process clause itself does not create a liberty interest in credit for good behavior.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.