Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Biddle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Biddle Anchor | green | “evidence is substantial if it would convince a rational fact finder that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 11 |
| 2 | State v. Biddle | green | “we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, including legitimate inferences and presumptions that may fairly and reasonably be deduced from the record evidence.” | 10 |
| 3 | State v. Hansen | green | “challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence are reviewed for correction of errors at law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.