Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque Anchor | green | “stare decisis is the judicial obligation to follow precedent, and it lies at the very core of the judicial process of interpreting and announcing law.” | 10 |
| 2 | Madrid v. Village of Chama | green | “dismissal under rule 1-012(b)(6) is appropriate only if the non-moving party is not entitled to recover under any theory of the facts alleged in their complaint.” | 5 |
| 3 | Jordan v. Allstate Insurance | green | “inform the insured about premium costs corresponding to the available levels of coverage.” | 4 |
| 4 | Madrid v. Village of Chama | green | “only that the plaintiff allege facts sufficient to put the defendant on notice of his claims.” | 3 |
| 5 | Madrid v. Village of Chama | green | “the purpose of our rule is to test the law of the claim, not the facts that support it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.