Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters Anchor | green | “cannot simply pick a number and put it in the blank.” | 10 |
| 2 | Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters | green | “simply pick a number and put it in the blank.” | 10 |
| 3 | J.B. Custom Design & Building v. Clawson | green | “a high degree of mental pain and distress' that is 'more than mere worry, anxiety, vexation, embarrassment, or anger' to support any award of damages.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.