Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte White.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte White Anchor | green | “when the facts are undisputed and an appellate court is presented with pure questions of law, that court's review in a rule 32 proceeding is de novo .” | 13 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Ingram | green | “presided over ingram's capital murder trial and personally observed the performance of both lawyers throughout ingram's trial and sentencing,” | 4 |
| 3 | Jenkins v. State | green | “when the record before this court clearly establishes that the order signed by the trial court denying postconviction relief is not the product of the trial court's independent judgment” | 4 |
| 4 | Davis v. State | green | “in order to succeed on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a petitioner must meet both prongs of the standard set out in strickland .” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.