Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Randall v. Dallas Power & Light Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Randall v. Dallas Power & Light Co. Anchor | green | “if conflicting inferences may be drawn from a deposition and from an affidavit filed by the same party in opposition to a motion for summary judgment, a fact issue is presented.” | 7 |
| 2 | Villagomez v. Rockwood Specialties, Inc. | green | “both in practice and by written agreement,” | 3 |
| 3 | Villagomez v. Rockwood Specialties, Inc. | green | “directly in its corporate capacity as the parent, not from behind the veil of the subsidiary's board of directors.” | 3 |
| 4 | Villagomez v. Rockwood Specialties, Inc. | green | “extended directly into texas its business of owning other businesses and directly facilitating their profitability.” | 3 |
| 5 | Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz | green | “occasional travel to texas is insufficient by itself to establish continuous and systematic contact with the state.” | 3 |
| 6 | Rebecca George v. Adam M. Deardorff and Lana Wirsig | green | “all times material to this lawsuit, eni s.p.a. was doing business in houston, harris county, texas.” | 3 |
| 7 | Benz Group, Lynx Petroleum, Ltd., Robert Samuel Braswell, IV., Fortune Jaubert Alexander, Tom Schmidt and Benz Liquidation, LLC v. Flavio MacH Barreto | green | “adduced evidence that brazil was the main location for the negotiations, agreements, alleged misdeeds, and ongoing business relevant to the dispute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.