Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from BBF Engineering Services, PC v. State of Mich..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BBF Engineering Services, PC v. State of Mich. Anchor | green | “where the entity is named as a defendant, an official-capacity claim is redundant.” | 14 |
| 2 | Faith Baptist Church v. Waterford Township | green | “plaintiffs' claims against bedell in his official capacity were properly dismissed because they were in actuality claims against the township of waterford, which is itself a defendant.” | 4 |
| 3 | Cavanaugh v. McBride | green | “because cavanaugh has raised claims against otsego county, the claims against the county's sheriff and undersheriff in their official capacities are duplicative and will be dismissed.” | 4 |
| 4 | SWARTZ AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. v. Genesee County | green | “because cavanaugh has raised claims against otsego county, the claims against the county's sheriff and undersheriff in their official capacities are duplicative and will be dismissed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.