Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chamberlin v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chamberlin v. State Anchor | green | “has held unequivocally that mississippi's method of lethal injection does not violate the eighth amendment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Eric James Foster v. State of Mississippi | green | “a defendant's substantive or fundamental rights are affected.” | 4 |
| 3 | Eric James Foster v. State of Mississippi | green | “resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice” | 4 |
| 4 | Hardy v. State | green | “(1) the essential elements of the crime charged, (2) sufficient facts to fairly inform the defendant of the charge which he must defend, and (3) sufficient facts to enable him to plead double jeopardy in the event of a future prosecution for the same offense.” | 4 |
| 5 | Curtis Giovanni Flowers v. State of Mississippi | green | “create such an atmosphere of bias, passion, and prejudice that they effectively deny the defendant a fundamentally fair trial.” | 3 |
| 6 | Curtis Giovanni Flowers v. State of Mississippi | green | “within the sound discretion of the trial court.” | 3 |
| 7 | Hardy v. State | green | “to plead double jeopardy in the event of a future prosecution for the same offense.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.