Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 138 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ragas v. Koch Gateway Pipeline Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ragas v. Koch Gateway Pipeline Company Anchor | green | “the party opposing summary judgment is required to identify specific evidence in the record and to articulate the precise manner in which that evidence supports his or her claim.” | 78 |
| 2 | Wyatt v. Hunt Plywood Co Inc | green | “if its resolution could affect the outcome of the action.” | 24 |
| 3 | Beck v. Somerset Technologies, Inc. | green | “a factual dispute is 'genuine' if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 13 |
| 4 | Leslie Coleman v. United States | green | “summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 12 |
| 5 | Loggerhead Holdings v. BP | green | “summary judgment should be granted where critical evidence is so weak or tenuous on an essential fact that it could not support a judgment in favor of the nonmovant.” | 7 |
| 6 | Certain Underwriters v. Cox Operating | green | “the summary judgment movant bears the burden of proving that no genuine issue of material fact exists.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.