Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re A.E..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re A.E. Anchor | green | “a court's decision to terminate parental rights will not be overturned as against the manifest weight of the evidence if the record contains competent, credible evidence by which a court can determine by clear and convincing evidence that the essential statutory elements for a t…” | 8 |
| 2 | In re A.F. | green | “if the trial court determines that any provision enumerated in r.c. 2151.414(b)(1) applies, the trial court must determine, by clear and convincing evidence, whether granting the agency permanent custody of the child is in the child's best interest.” | 5 |
| 3 | In re A.W. | green | “if the trial court determines that any provision enumerated in r.c. 2151.414(b)(1) applies, the trial court must determine, by clear and convincing evidence, whether granting the agency permanent custody of the child is in the child's best interest.” | 5 |
| 4 | In re A.F. | green | “determine, by clear and convincing evidence, whether granting the agency permanent custody of the child is in the child's best interest.” | 4 |
| 5 | In re W.J. | green | “it is generally accepted that a trial court is not limited to considering only current compliance with case plan objectives or objectives related to housing and income in its analysis of the child's need for a legally secure permanent placement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.