Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Leo P. Pratt, III v. Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Department of Corrections.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leo P. Pratt, III v. Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Department of Corrections Anchor | green | “to properly preserve an issue, a party must present the issue to the administrative agency 'with specificity and clarity in a manner which gives the agency a fair opportunity to rule on it.” | 12 |
| 2 | Jordan v. State | green | “a party's failure to exhaust administrative remedies permits a court to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.