Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 25 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from OneWest Bank, FSB v. Singer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OneWest Bank, FSB v. Singer Anchor | green | “mere neglect is not a reasonable excuse” | 10 |
| 2 | Ki Tae Kim v. Bishop | green | “the determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the supreme court's discretion” | 5 |
| 3 | Ki Tae Kim v. Bishop | green | “detailed and credible explanation” | 4 |
| 4 | OneWest Bank, FSB v. Singer | green | “although a court has the discretion to accept law office failure as a reasonable excuse for a party's default ( see cplr 2005), such default should not be routinely excused, and 'mere neglect is not a reasonable excuse” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.