Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 169 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Grier.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Grier Anchor | green | “below an objective standard of reasonableness.” | 62 |
| 2 | State v. Grier | green | “there is no conceivable legitimate tactic explaining counsel's performance.” | 31 |
| 3 | State v. Kyllo | green | “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's deficient performance, the outcome of the proceedings would have been different.” | 26 |
| 4 | State v. Kyllo | green | “prove that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's deficient performance, the outcome of the proceedings would have been different.” | 19 |
| 5 | State v. Bertrand | green | “the defendant must overcome 'a strong presumption that counsel's performance was reasonable.” | 10 |
| 6 | State Of Washington v. Kevin Lee Estes | green | “a reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” | 8 |
| 7 | State Of Washington v. Kevin Lee Estes | green | “there is a reasonable probability . . . the result of the proceeding would have differed.” | 8 |
| 8 | State v. Bertrand | green | “prejudice exists when there is 'a probability sufficient to undermine the court's confidence in the outcome.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.