Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pamela Garrett v. Athens-Clarke County, Georgia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pamela Garrett v. Athens-Clarke County, Georgia Anchor | green | “whether, at the time of the incident, every objectively reasonable police officer would have realized the acts violated already clearly established federal law.” | 8 |
| 2 | No. 02-3519 | green | “as we have held, a fourth amendment seizure occurs as a result of a car collision only where the police officer intended the collision to be the result.” | 4 |
| 3 | No. 02-3519 | green | “posed an imminent threat of serious physical harm to himself and to others as evidenced by suspect's driving head-on into the officer's vehicle” | 4 |
| 4 | Darryl Pruitt v. The City of Montgomery, Alabama | green | “force which, under the circumstances in which it is used, is readily capable of causing death or other serious injury.” | 3 |
| 5 | Harris v. Coweta County | green | “consists of a two-part inquiry.” | 3 |
| 6 | Pamela Garrett v. Athens-Clarke County, Georgia | green | “every objectively reasonable police officer would have realized the acts violated already clearly established federal law.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.