Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Killingsworth v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Killingsworth v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. Anchor | green | “claim is sufficiently plausible to survive a motion to dismiss is 'a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.” | 18 |
| 2 | Matthew M. Benning v. Board Of Regents Of Regency Universities | green | “the eleventh amendment forbids a federal court from ordering state officials to conform their conduct to state law.” | 3 |
| 3 | Ulysses Scott v. L. Altamirano | green | “all of the defendants in this suit, however, are public employees (plus their employer), which means that a conspiracy claim has no role to play.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.