Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of New York v. Federal Communications Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of New York v. Federal Communications Commission Anchor | green | “represents a reasonable accommodation of conflicting policies that were committed to the agency's care by the statute, we should not disturb it unless it appears from the statute or its legislative history that the accommodation is not one that congress would have sanctioned.” | 10 |
| 2 | Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc. | green | “when congress, through express delegation or the introduction of an interpretive gap in the statutory structure, has delegated policy-making authority to an administrative agency, the extent of judicial review of the agency's policy determinations is limited.” | 8 |
| 3 | James Bunning v. Commonwealth of Kentucky and Kentucky Registry of Election Finance, an Independent Agency of the Commonwealth of Kentucky | green | “falls squarely within the boundaries of the preempted domain” | 3 |
| 4 | Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee | green | “entitled to due deference and is to be accepted by the court unless demonstrably irrational or clearly contrary to the plain meaning of the statute” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.