Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vivian D. Redding v. Beverly St. Eward, Detroit Police Officer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vivian D. Redding v. Beverly St. Eward, Detroit Police Officer Anchor | green | “if a plaintiff fails to make a showing on any essential element of a 1983 claim, the claim must fail.” | 13 |
| 2 | Paige v. Coyner | green | “a claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.