Topic: the litigant's interests in immediate judicial review outwe… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #16566

5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Avocados Plus Inc v. Veneman, Ann M..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Avocados Plus Inc v. Veneman, Ann M. Anchor
cadc · 2004
green “the litigant's interests in immediate judicial review outweigh the government's interests in the efficiency or administrative autonomy that the exhaustion doctrine is designed to further.” 6
2 Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. Weinberger
cadc · 1986
green “the administrative process is inadequate where the agency has expressed a willingness to act, but the relief it will provide through its action will not be sufficient to right the wrong.” 5
3 Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. Weinberger
cadc · 1986
green “the agency has expressed a willingness to act, but the relief it will provide through its action will not be sufficient to right the wrong.” 5
4 Jesse I. Etelson v. Office of Personnel Management
cadc · 1982
green “an adverse decision can also be certain if an agency has articulated a very clear position on the issue which it has demonstrated it would be unwilling to reconsider.” 4
5 Bennett v. United States
vawd · 2005
green “interpreted the exhaustion requirement as jurisdictional” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check