Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United States Anchor | green | “when tainted by bad faith or an abuse of contracting discretion, a termination for convenience causes a contract breach.” | 7 |
| 2 | Rizzo v. Shinseki | green | “the presumption of regularity provides that, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, the court will presume that public officers have properly discharged their official duties.” | 6 |
| 3 | Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United States | green | “simply to acquire a better bargain from another source.” | 4 |
| 4 | T & M Distributors, Inc. v. United States | green | “in the absence of bad faith or clear abuse of discretion, the contracting officer's election to terminate for the government's convenience is conclusive.” | 4 |
| 5 | Praecomm, Inc. v. United States | green | “if the contract contains a termination for convenience clause and the contracting officer could have invoked the clause instead of terminating, rescinding or repudiating the contract on some other invalid basis, the court will constructively invoke the clause to retroactively ju…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.