Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Glory Obianuju Ezeagwuna v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glory Obianuju Ezeagwuna v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States Anchor | green | “will not be disturbed unless it is found to be arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law,” | 18 |
| 2 | Pllumi v. Attorney General of the United States | green | “regardless of the underlying basis of the alien's request for relief.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.